Should music streaming sites fear the same fate as Netflix? | show biz

Subscribers to paid music platforms continue to increase their listening time.  — Shutterstock photo
Subscribers to paid music platforms proceed to extend their listening time. — Shutterstock picture

LOS ANGELES, April 29 ― Instances are robust for subscription video streaming companies as Netflix has seen its subscriber base shrink for the primary time in 10 years. That is a trigger for concern for music streaming suppliers, who worry their development will sluggish after two years of the pandemic.

The information got here as a shock – Netflix misplaced 200,000 subscribers in three months, whereas analysts had anticipated it to achieve 2.5 million. The video streaming chief explains this collapse by the battle in Ukraine, however primarily by structural elements akin to account sharing and competitors from new market entrants.

Consultants at the moment are involved that the identical phenomenon will have an effect on streaming music. This market has grown to this point. In truth, streaming is now the primary strategy to take heed to music world wide. Of the $25.9 billion in income generated by recorded music in 2021, $16.9 billion (RM73.6 billion) will come from streaming, or 65% of the full, as detailed by the Worldwide Federation of the Phonographic Trade (IFPI) in its newest annual report. Between 2020 and 2021, revenues from this kind of music consumption thus elevated by 24.3 p.c.

This enhance is especially because of pay-per-view streaming, with income development of 21.9%. And – excellent news for Spotify, Apple Music and others – subscribers to paid music platforms are continually growing their listening time. They now spend 1 hour and 33 minutes listening to music as a substitute of 1 hour and 26 minutes, in response to a current GWI research of media consumption. This pattern is seen in all areas of the world, though it continues to be pushed primarily by the Americas (Latin and North) in addition to Africa and the Center East. That is excellent news for trade gamers, who’re multiplying growth initiatives into these territories – Spotify within the lead. In November, the Swedish group was launched within the Republic of Congo, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Libya and Iraq.

The music reveals resistance

The spectacular well being of streaming music would possibly come as a shock in comparison with its video-based counterpart. However that is testomony to the dominant place that music – and extra usually audio content material – ​​now occupies in our lives. For a lot of, music has been an actual supply of consolation through the pandemic. Video streaming platforms have served the identical perform, however that impact is beginning to wane within the face of current worth will increase. In response, many households are slicing again on leisure spending. This pattern is especially seen within the UK, the place the variety of households subscribing to not less than one streaming service dropped by 215,000 through the first quarter of 2022, in response to Kantar. “In instances of monetary uncertainty, companies have to be indispensable within the minds of subscribers,” Dominic Sunnebo, director of worldwide imaginative and prescient at Kantar Worldpanel, instructed The Guardian. “In consequence, it’s now extra vital than ever for SVoD suppliers to reveal to shoppers how indispensable their companies are at dwelling in what has change into a extremely aggressive market.”

However music streaming platforms nonetheless appear to be spared. The urge for food for this type of leisure persists for a wide range of causes, akin to the necessity to disconnect and the power to take heed to tens of millions of songs every time (and wherever) you need. “The great thing about audio is that it may be consumed together with different media or behaviors, and it normally is,” explains the GWI in its newest research. One other benefit for Spotify, Deezer and the like is that music streaming is a mode of consumption adopted by everybody, no matter age. Gen Z and Millennials notably like him. They spend 1 hour and 55 minutes and 1 hour and 43 minutes respectively on this exercise per day. That is considerably greater than Child Boomers, who clearly favor radio (1 hour and 5 minutes versus 40 minutes for streaming music).

Whereas music streaming is mostly doing nicely, it stays an especially aggressive market. Sweden’s Spotify nonetheless reigns supreme, despite the fact that it’s now adopted by rising gamers like China’s Tencent Music and NetEase Cloud Music. They account for 18% of worldwide market subscribers, though they’re solely obtainable within the Center Kingdom, in response to analytics agency MIDiA Analysis. One other (modest) competitor is Deezer, the French pioneer of on-line music listening. The platform just lately entered into “a definitive merger settlement” with listed firm I2PO because it prepares to go public. He backed out of a earlier try in 2015, citing “unfavorable market circumstances”. Situations seem like rather more favorable now – proof, maybe, that music streaming doesn’t (but) meet the identical destiny as Netflix. ― ETX Studio


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.